IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-24699-7_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

“Hunkies,” “Gasbags,” and “Reds”: The Construction and Deconstruction of Labor’s Hegemonic Masculinities in Black Fury (1935) and Riff Raff (1936)

In: Class Struggle on the Home Front

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Cassano

Abstract

In the late 1960s, John Sinclair managed the radical, proto-punk band, MC5. They were militant communists and shared the Trans-Love house in Michigan. But in their commune the exploitation was obvious. Kathy Asheton recalls: “John Sinclair was a pig … [MC5] were really chauvinistic … I wasn’t friendly with the girls at Trans-Love … I’d come over in party mode, all primped to go out for the night, and they’d all be on their knees scrubbing the floor” (McNeil and McCain 1996: 46–7). This blindness to an exploitation grounded in gendered oppression characterized much of the male-dominated left during the twentieth century and helped fuel a long history of animosity between feminists and male-dominated social movements. In this chapter, I explore the contours of that animosity through two cultural artifacts, the films Black Fury (1935) and Riff Raff (1936). Both of these films take up the “labor question” at a moment in history when no other question seemed to matter as much. Both films are sympathetic toward organized labor, but in very different ways.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Cassano, 2009. "“Hunkies,” “Gasbags,” and “Reds”: The Construction and Deconstruction of Labor’s Hegemonic Masculinities in Black Fury (1935) and Riff Raff (1936)," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Graham Cassano (ed.), Class Struggle on the Home Front, chapter 11, pages 239-263, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-24699-7_11
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230246997_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-24699-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.