IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/intecp/978-1-349-15410-4_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Discussion of the Paper by Professor Bénard

In: Planning and Market Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Kaser

    (St Antony’s College)

  • Richard Portes

    (Princeton University)

Abstract

Professor Dorfman said that Professor Bénard had raised two basic questions: First, what were the grounds for subsidising or penalising the consumption of certain goods, and to what extent should we do so? That was the problem of model A. Second, why did the government sometimes provide or subsidise goods that were also available through private sources, and to what extent should this be done? That was the topic of model B. Professor Bénard accepted the three conventional justifications for taxes or subsidies on certain goods — externalities, public goods and redistribution. His models, however, were built around a fourth point, the need to correct for deficient information on the part of consumers. Professor Dorfman wished to question this argument, while adding a fifth.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Kaser & Richard Portes, 1971. "Discussion of the Paper by Professor Bénard," International Economic Association Series, in: Michael Kaser & Richard Portes (ed.), Planning and Market Relations, pages 249-253, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-15410-4_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-15410-4_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:intecp:978-1-349-15410-4_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.