IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/gtechp/978-1-137-31450-5_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Cost Controversies

In: Arthur Cecil Pigou

Author

Listed:
  • Nahid Aslanbeigui

    (Monmouth University)

  • Guy Oakes

    (Monmouth University)

Abstract

In the first three decades of the twentieth century the analysis of the laws of returns developed by Marshall and Pigou enkindled several contro­versies. Conceived most narrowly, they revolved around the functional relationship between costs and output and its implications for economic welfare.1 Regarded more broadly, they entailed important consequences for Cambridge economics. At the time of his retirement, Marshall’s Principles endowed his successors with several alternative profiles for the future of economics. In light of the unrivalled pre-eminence of this book — Joan Robinson called it the ‘bible’ of Cambridge economics in the 1920s (Robinson 1951, vii) — how Cambridge economics devel­oped would depend on how his disciples interpreted it. On this point, the conception of time in Marshall’s thought was critical. Should his followers adopt the framework of comparative statics elaborated in the Principles? Or should they attempt to develop an evolutionary theory, using as inspiration the organic metaphors with which Marshall embel­lished some of his arguments? For a number of reasons, Pigou took the former course, which rested on the concept he saw as the cornerstone of economics: the national dividend. In the ensuing, we consider the cost controversies of these years in so far as they bear upon Pigou’s interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Nahid Aslanbeigui & Guy Oakes, 2015. "The Cost Controversies," Great Thinkers in Economics, in: Arthur Cecil Pigou, chapter 5, pages 136-174, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:gtechp:978-1-137-31450-5_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137314505_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:gtechp:978-1-137-31450-5_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.