IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this book chapter or follow this series

Quality Evaluation of Higher Education Programmes: Process and Challenges in Latvia

  • Ieva Brence

    (Latvian Academy of Sciences, Latvia)

  • Baiba Rivza

    (Latvian Academy of Sciences, Latvia)

Registered author(s):

    The aim of the paper is to analyze process of higher education programmes’ quality evaluation and define its main challenges, basing on the case of Latvia. At present stage the evaluation of higher education study programmes is realized in frames of the European Social Fund financed project “Evaluation of higher education programmes and proposals for quality improvement”(the Project) from May 2011 – April 2013. There are approximately 950 higher education study programmes in Latvia, and most of them are evaluated in frames of the Project. Apart from accreditation this is the first Project for evaluating the quality of higher education programmes in Latvia, thus requiring analysis on its performance. Investigations included in the paper are based both on theoretical concepts (e.g., Baartman, 2007, Bornmann, et.al, 2006, Darussalam, 2010, Gikanti, Morrow, Davis, 2011, Gomez, 2007, Kai, 2009, Nesman, 2007, Sarrico, et.al, 2010, Smith, 2008, Yarmorharmmadian, 2011, Westerheijden, et.al, 2007, etc.), on statistical data analysis provided by Latvian higher education institutions in frames of the Project and on interviews with the Project administration. The paper concludes that evaluation of higher education programmes is a complex issue not only due to the number of data necessary for ensuring the evaluating the higher education quality, but also due to the different types of calculations the higher education institutions use e.g. for registering their academic staff or financing available for one programme. The paper provides summary of the main challenges having arisen during the evaluation of higher education programmes’.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.issbs.si/press/ISBN/978-961-6813-10-5/papers/ML12_147.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.issbs.si/press/ISBN/978-961-6813-10-5/MakeLearn2012.pdf
    File Function: Conference Programme
    Download Restriction: no

    as
    in new window

    This chapter was published in: Ieva Brence & Baiba Rivza , , pages 787-795, 2012.
    This item is provided by International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia in its series Knowledge and Learning: Global Empowerment; Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2012 with number 787-795.
    Handle: RePEc:isv:mklp12:787-795
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.issbs.si

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isv:mklp12:787-795. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Goran Dakovic)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.