IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this book chapter

Can We Use the Statistical Causality with Sufficient Reliability?

Listed author(s):
  • Aleksander Janes

    (University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, Slovenia)

  • Slavko Dolinsek

    (Institute for Innovation and Development, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, and Faculty of Management Koper, University of Primorska, Slovenia)

Registered author(s):

    Purpose of this applicative project research (ARRS L5-2329) is the identification and analysis of the key process indicators which significantly contribute to the benefits of the business processes exploitation in the company of Luka Koper, d.d. Beside that is our intention to display the importance of the systematic process approach. With this case study we attempted to get deeper understanding, and to clarify and evaluate the causalities between enablers and results. Long-term framed qualitative and quantitative analyses indicate the benefit of the identificated key processes indicators or Balanced Scorecard (BSC) and their influence on the fulfilment of the strategic directions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    File Function: Conference Programme
    Download Restriction: no

    in new window

    This chapter was published in: Aleksander Janes & Slavko Dolinsek , , pages 259-266, 2011.
    This item is provided by International School for Social and Business Studies, Celje, Slovenia in its series Knowledge as Business Opportunity: Proceedings of the Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2011 with number 259-266.
    Handle: RePEc:isv:mklp11:259-266
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isv:mklp11:259-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Alen JeĹžovnik)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.