IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/rhetzz/s0743-4154(2010)000028a022.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark Antitrust law & policy in terms of the legal-economic nexuspitofsky's

In: A Research Annual

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Mercuro

Abstract

The first contribution to this section is by Richard Schmalensee titled “Thoughts on the Chicago school legacy in U.S. antitrust.” It appears the purpose of this essay is to set up a target for the rest of the contributors to shoot at – a target that is emphatically pro-Chicago. In his essay, Schmalensee reviews some of the aspects of U.S. antitrust policy that outraged Chicago school lawyers and economists in the 1970s. He takes a brief look at some of Chicago's subsequent victories that he claims are now generally accepted as positive changes. And finally, he argues that some of Chicago's lost battles also constitute positive aspects of its legacy. His discussion is focused on four broad issues: the objectives of antitrust, the past policy toward “no-fault” concentration, the treatment of productive efficiency, and the evaluation of non-standard business conduct (pp. 11–12).

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Mercuro, 2010. "How the Chicago School Overshot the Mark Antitrust law & policy in terms of the legal-economic nexuspitofsky's," Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, in: A Research Annual, pages 405-438, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rhetzz:s0743-4154(2010)000028a022
    DOI: 10.1108/S0743-4154(2010)000028A022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-4154(2010)000028A022/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-4154(2010)000028A022/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S0743-4154(2010)000028A022/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S0743-4154(2010)000028A022
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S0743-4154(2010)000028A022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rhetzz:s0743-4154(2010)000028a022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.