IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/rexezz/s0193-2306(04)10009-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Bargaining Behavior, Demographics And Nationality: What Can The Experimental Evidence Show?

In: Field Experiments in Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Anabela Botelho
  • Glenn W. Harrison
  • Marc A. Hirsch
  • Elisabet E. Rutström

Abstract

Field experiments have raised important issues of interpretation of bargaining behavior. There is evidence that bargaining behavior appears to vary across groups of populations, such as nationality, ethnicity and sex. Differences have been observed with respect to initial behavior and with respect to the adjustment pattern over time. Often, such behavioral differences are referred to as cultural, although the delineation of the cultural group has been confined to one or other observable characteristic in isolation. We show that this way of characterizing cultural differences is overly simplistic: at best, it leads to unreliable claims; at worst, it leads to erroneous conclusions. We reconsider the evidence provided by previous experiments using ultimatum game rules, and undertake new experiments that expand the controls for demographics. The lesson from our demonstration is that the task of designing experiments for the field offers many challenges if one wants to define and control for cultural impacts, but that field experiments also offer potential for providing new insights into these issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Anabela Botelho & Glenn W. Harrison & Marc A. Hirsch & Elisabet E. Rutström, 2005. "Bargaining Behavior, Demographics And Nationality: What Can The Experimental Evidence Show?," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Field Experiments in Economics, pages 337-372, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:rexezz:s0193-2306(04)10009-4
    DOI: 10.1016/S0193-2306(04)10009-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0193-2306(04)10009-4/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1016/S0193-2306(04)10009-4/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/S0193-2306(04)10009-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:rexezz:s0193-2306(04)10009-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.