IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/csefzz/s1569-375920160000097010.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Recent Annual Report Weaknesses by a Supreme Audit Institution: An Analysis

In: Contemporary Issues in Bank Financial Management

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J. Baldacchino
  • Daniel Pule
  • Norbert Tabone
  • Justine Agius

Abstract

This chapter is based on the Annual Report on Public Accounts prepared by the Maltese National Audit Office (NAO), Malta’s Supreme Audit Institution. Its objectives are to analyse and classify the reported issues, evaluate their significance and how the findings are reflected in the Public Sector, and assess the adequacy of the communication of these findings through the Annual Report. The research consisted of a qualitative analysis of the Annual Reports for the three years 2007, 2009 and 2011. This analysis was supplemented by unstructured interviews conducted with both NAO and Government officials. Findings report a significant number of issues emerging from different factors. The highest incidence of weaknesses was related to record-keeping and compliance with policies and procedures. Moreover, the interviews with NAO officials showed that the departments were not always taking on board the recommendations made through the Annual Reports, thus indicating a passive attitude towards the reported findings. The results also show that while the Government has its own structures of checks-and-balances to prevent and detect errors, and no internal control system is completely effective, there is still much room for improvement within the Public Sector to ensure that public funds are appropriately utilised. The detection of various issues by the NAO is therefore inevitable, particularly given the complexity and size of the Public Sector. In conclusion, the NAO findings should be more thoroughly examined to reduce the incidence of issues. Furthermore, the way forward should be directed at enhancing the current systems and promoting a more positive relationship between the NAO and auditees.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J. Baldacchino & Daniel Pule & Norbert Tabone & Justine Agius, 2016. "Recent Annual Report Weaknesses by a Supreme Audit Institution: An Analysis," Contemporary Studies in Economic and Financial Analysis, in: Contemporary Issues in Bank Financial Management, volume 97, pages 133-156, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:csefzz:s1569-375920160000097010
    DOI: 10.1108/S1569-375920160000097010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-375920160000097010/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-375920160000097010/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S1569-375920160000097010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-375920160000097010/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S1569-375920160000097010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:csefzz:s1569-375920160000097010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.