IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/eme/aaeczz/s1529-213420190000024005.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Diversity in the Moral Sciences

In: Assessing Austrian Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Gerald Gaus

Abstract

Pete Boettke’s “What Is Still Wrong with the Austrian School of Economics?” sketches a program for Austrian economics based on a Kuhnesque analysis of scientific communities. His core recommendations focus on what we might call theUptake and Diffusiondimensions of the scientific enterprise. If taken as a core commitment, they entail anIntegrationistprogram, a concomitant of which is a reduction in the unique insights of the Austrian approach and, so, an overall reduction of the diversity of perspectives in political economy and moral sciences. A cost of this program is to decrease the diversity of perspectives in economics, which in turn decreases the ability of Republic of Economic Science to explore and solve a wider variety of problems. The author presents the “Fundamental Diversity Dilemma,” according to which there is a trade-off between uptake/plausibility and diversity: as we increase uptake and plausibility, we decrease diversity. The author concludes with a defense of the role of heterodox research programs, and questioning the focus on a small set of metrics to indicate excellent and important research.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerald Gaus, 2019. "Diversity in the Moral Sciences," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Assessing Austrian Economics, volume 24, pages 49-59, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:aaeczz:s1529-213420190000024005
    DOI: 10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005/full/epub?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec&title=10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/S1529-213420190000024005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:aaeczz:s1529-213420190000024005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.