IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/22413_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The framework of equal protection analysis in America

In: Renmin Chinese Law Review

Author

Listed:
  • Liu Jianlong

Abstract

Though the Constitution and the laws of China offer a comprehensive normative system for the realization and guaranteeing of the right to equality, such right has been frequently violated. The highlighted rationality review is unable to realize the goal of the Constitution. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the guaranteeing of right to equality by introducing a framework of analysis, with the purpose of equipping the guaranteeing system with ‘teeth’ to ‘bite off’ the violations. In this regard, the American framework of equal protection analysis should be considered as a model. The equal protection amendment and its content were formulated after the American Civil War and have experienced a long and rough progress. The framework of equal protection analysis is a vital part of the equal protection jurisprudence. It is a complicated multi-tier framework compiled with rationality review, intermediate review and strict scrutiny. It applies a standard of review to a classification according to the criteria and importance of the right involved and reviews whether the means adopted is substantially related to the end pursued. It helps to protect the rights and control the powers. However, it has been criticized of being impracticable, subjective and too formal, which might be cured by shifting the weight on the means of scrutiny, consolidating the classification criterions and highlighting a more comprehensive consideration while determining which standard of review should apply.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu Jianlong, 2023. "The framework of equal protection analysis in America," Chapters, in: Renmin Chinese Law Review, chapter 11, pages 278-310, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:22413_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035313976.00015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asian Studies; Law - Academic;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:22413_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.