IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/22413_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The status and determination of 'trademark use' in trademark infringement

In: Renmin Chinese Law Review

Author

Listed:
  • Lv Bingbin

Abstract

It is not only the practical need to solve new trademark disputes, but also a fundamental issue of constructing trademark law principles, to clarify the status of ‘trademark use’. Based on the standpoint of legalism, the ‘use’ in the composition of trademark infringement should be ‘trademark use’, i.e. the use of trademarks in the sense of source indication. ‘Trademark use’ is an independent element in the composition of trademark infringement that is juxtaposed with the likelihood of confusion. Theoretically, ‘trademark use’ corresponds to the optimal degree of trademark-propertization, i.e. to protect property interests resulting from the source distinction function of a trademark. The condition of ‘trademark use’ is conducive to the correct delineation of the protection scope of trademark. Further, the independent status of ‘trademark use’ depends on whether it has an independent criterion. The ‘trademark use’ should be determined from the perspective of the user, rather than consumers. The nature of use should be analyzed by taking into consideration both the objective and subjective elements. The subjective intent of the user can be identified. What is needed in legal construction is to search for an objective method of determining subjective elements. The judgment standard from the perspective of the user is quite adaptable in boundary cases, such as foreign-related Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) cases and keyword advertising cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Lv Bingbin, 2023. "The status and determination of 'trademark use' in trademark infringement," Chapters, in: Renmin Chinese Law Review, chapter 10, pages 250-277, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:22413_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035313976.00014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Asian Studies; Law - Academic;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:22413_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.