IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/22409_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

From guinea pigs to agents: the potential of participatory action research in union revitalisation and worker participation studies

In: Field Guide to Researching Employment and Industrial Relations

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Chaves
  • Sara Lafuente

Abstract

A key concern in European trade union studies and policy is whether, and how, labour organisations can meet challenges in the 21st century’s world of work amid multiple crises, given a steady decline in their affiliation and power since the 1980s. This chapter argues that participatory action research (PAR) fruitfully supports union revitalisation endeavours. PAR mobilises methodological tools that can enhance union capabilities and more democratic ways of functioning, strengthening labour organisations’ associational and discursive power in the long-term. This approach sees unions as partners of knowledge production and actors of transformative policies, rather than as passive objects of research. However, despite PAR being particularly well suited to solving collective problems in organisations or communities, it has rarely been applied in industrial relations (IR) and union settings and research (Huw and Turnbull, 2023; Martin et al., 2003). Drawing on a recent PAR project, the chapter introduces PAR as a social science methodology and explains its under-utilisation in IR, despite its potential benefits, particularly in the field of worker participation and union revitalisation. Following the “Democratising Endesa” PAR project case, it evaluates the methodology and reflects on challenges that were encountered. The chapter concludes with recommendations for activist scholars and unions interested in using PAR to better understand and support union revitalisation processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Chaves & Sara Lafuente, 2024. "From guinea pigs to agents: the potential of participatory action research in union revitalisation and worker participation studies," Chapters, in: Jane Parker & Noelle Donnelly & Sue Ressia & Mihajla Gavin (ed.), Field Guide to Researching Employment and Industrial Relations, chapter 3, pages 47-69, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:22409_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781035313891.00016
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:22409_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.