IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21631_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The public service exemption under the Luxembourg Rail Protocol: The right balance between the public and private interests?

In: The Elgar Companion to UNIDROIT

Author

Listed:
  • Sanam Saidova

Abstract

This chapter examines the public service exemption under Article XXV of the Rail Protocol (RP) and evaluates whether this exception strikes the right balance between the creditors’ private interests against the interests of the public. On the one hand, secured creditors need to be certain that in case of the debtor’s default they will be able to enforce their international interests in the railway rolling stock. This legal certainty is essential in reducing the risks for the creditor and consequently reducing the cost and increasing availability of the credit for the debtor. On the other hand, repossession, sale and exercise of some other remedies can disrupt an important public service performed by railway systems, which can have economic and political ramifications. This chapter explores the exemption’s rationale and its constituent elements. It specifically focuses on: the content of a declaration, required to be made for a Contracting State to invoke this exemption; the meaning of the concept of ‘public importance’ and whether this is a matter falling within the RP or is to be decided based on a Contracting State’s discretion. This chapter also evaluates the extent to which the exception protects the interests of the creditors.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanam Saidova, 2024. "The public service exemption under the Luxembourg Rail Protocol: The right balance between the public and private interests?," Chapters, in: Thomas John & Rishi Gulati & Ben Köhler (ed.), The Elgar Companion to UNIDROIT, chapter 20, pages 285-299, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21631_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781803924564.00033
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Law - Academic; Politics and Public Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21631_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.