IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/21210_14.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A review of COVID-19 organisational recovery in a UK metropolitan police force utilising a complexity theory framework

In: Research Handbook on Public Management and COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Phil Davies

Abstract

Complexity theory within public management is becoming a recognised field, but without current consensus about the contribution the approach can make to theory and practice. This chapter seeks to contribute to this debate and offers a practical example of a route to engage with management practitioners within policing in the case of recovery work for COVID-19, by examining the local context, networks and relationships of the complex human systems that developed during COVID-19 policing responses. Utilising a Grounded Theory approach, this qualitative study of the accounts of senior police leaders involved identifies interconnected themes and structures that can be represented mathematically to support remodelling of future contingency planning for pandemics. It also presents the potential for wider applications for the field of public management by introducing the concept of hypernetworks into the business planning process, to ensure interconnectivity of functions is a consideration in a structured way.

Suggested Citation

  • Phil Davies, 2024. "A review of COVID-19 organisational recovery in a UK metropolitan police force utilising a complexity theory framework," Chapters, in: Helen Dickinson & Sophie Yates & Janine O’Flynn & Catherine Smith (ed.), Research Handbook on Public Management and COVID-19, chapter 14, pages 176-191, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21210_14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/doi/10.4337/9781802205954.00023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:21210_14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.