IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20851_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Evaluation of the safety performance of PPPs versus publicly funded and managed motorways in Spain

In: Assessing the Performance Advantage of Public-Private Partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Albalate
  • Germà Bel
  • Paula Bel-Piñana

Abstract

The development of the motorway network in Spain has generated an unusual mixed model of funding and management. We take advantage of the variability of this model to evaluate the contribution of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) to road safety. We do this by comparing Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) concession-type PPPs, Operation and Management PPPs, and traditional publicly-funded motorways. We built a dataset for the 50 Spanish provinces for the period 2003-2019, which we analyze using panel data econometric methods. Our results suggest that both types of PPP motorways deliver better road safety outcomes than publicly managed motorways regarding accident rates. However, we do not find a statistically significant difference between the two PPP models. When we analyze the severity of accidents, our results indicate that only tolled PPP models perform better than publicly managed and funded motorways. However, there are no differences between publicly funded non-tolled motorways managed by the government or managed by a PPP.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Albalate & Germà Bel & Paula Bel-Piñana, 2022. "Evaluation of the safety performance of PPPs versus publicly funded and managed motorways in Spain," Chapters, in: Stefan Verweij & Ingmar van Meerkerk & Carter B. Casady (ed.), Assessing the Performance Advantage of Public-Private Partnerships, chapter 8, pages 184-205, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20851_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800889200/9781800889200.00016.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20851_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.