IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/20279_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Portugal and Spain

In: Research Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel Sousa Ferro
  • Francisco Marcos

Abstract

Chapter 16 analyzes the evolution and current state of antitrust damages litigation in Portugal and Spain. Both countries share the commonality of being novice jurisdictions in dealing with these types of claims. Courts and professionals have shown a willingness to meet challenges raised in handling antitrust damages' claims. In doing so, they have become a prominent jurisdictions for testing the projection of the principle of effectiveness of EU law in national rules, and dealing with the typical problems raised by antitrust claims (jurisdiction, standing, limitation periods, access to evidence). However, differences in the institutional and legal settings of both countries explain the different pictures emerging. Portuguese popular actions show a promising future as an efficient way of collectively managing these disputes, whilst the lack of any similar instrument in Spain explains the inefficient proliferation of multiple proceedings and judgments, with the consequent risks of the court system being clogged and different solutions being adopted. Given the incipiency of antitrust litigation in both countries, it is still too early to assess in a rigorous manner if they will become a welcoming forum for litigation by those aggrieved by antitrust infringements.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel Sousa Ferro & Francisco Marcos, 2023. "Portugal and Spain," Chapters, in: Barry J. Rodger & Miguel S. Ferro & Francisco Marcos (ed.), Research Handbook on Private Enforcement of Competition Law in the EU, chapter 16, pages 419-457, Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20279_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781800377523/9781800377523.00024.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Law - Academic;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:20279_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.