IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/13608_7.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Comparing public infrastructure procurement models

In: Global Developments in Public Infrastructure Procurement

Author

Listed:
  • .

Abstract

Undertaking comparative studies of alternative procurement models is a false trail for the various models have different drivers of value and merits. Consequently, the present chapter adopts a common approach to determine their characteristics and strengths. These models are: 1. Conventional unbundled procurement models Construct only Design and construct (D&C) / Design and build (DB) Engineering, procurement, construction (EPC) Design, construct, novate Construction management. 2. Other non-traditional unbundled models Managing contractor Alliance contracting Competitive alliance Early contractor involvement (ECI). 3. Bundled PPP models Design, build, operate, maintain (DBOM) Design, build, finance (DBF) Design, build, finance, operate (DBFO); Design, build, finance, maintain (DBFM) / Design, construct, maintain, finance (DCMF) Build, operate, transfer (BOT); Build, own, operate, transfer (BOOT); Build, own, operate (BOO). 4. The regulatory asset base model RAB model for new or improved infrastructure. Associated tables list their respective benefits and disadvantages, a comparison which leads directly to Chapter 8.

Suggested Citation

  • ., 2017. "Comparing public infrastructure procurement models," Chapters, in: Global Developments in Public Infrastructure Procurement, chapter 7, pages 178-210, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:13608_7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781848446304.00014.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6ii0ap3lau824p8g1q3n4jens3 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nacho Alvarez & Catherine Mathieu & Henri Sterdyniak, 2019. "Towards a progressive EMU fiscal governance," Sciences Po publications 13, Sciences Po.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:13608_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.