IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/cpr/ebchap/p375-09.html

Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia

In: The Political Economy of Social Media

Author

Listed:
  • Enikolopov, Ruben
  • Makarin, Alexey
  • Petrova, Maria

Abstract

Do new communication technologies, such as social media, alleviate the collective action problem? This paper provides evidence that penetration of VK, the dominant Russian online social network, led to more protest activity during a wave of protests in Russia in 2011. As a source of exogenous variation in network penetration, we use the information on the city of origin of the students who studied with the founder of VK, controlling for the city of origin of the students who studied at the same university several years earlier or later. We find that a 10% increase in VK penetration increased the probability of a protest by 4.6% and the number of protesters by 19%. Additional results suggest that social media induced protest activity by reducing the costs of coordination rather than by spreading information critical of the government. We observe that VK penetration increased pro‐governmental support, with no evidence of increased polarization. We also find that cities with higher fractionalization of network users between VK and Facebook experienced fewer protests, and the effect of VK on protests exhibits threshold behavior.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Enikolopov, Ruben & Makarin, Alexey & Petrova, Maria, 2023. "Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia," CEPR Press Book Chapters, in: Campante, Filipe & Durante, Ruben & Tesei, Andrea (ed.), The Political Economy of Social Media, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 9, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ebchap:p375-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cepr.org/node/430933
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D7 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making
    • H0 - Public Economics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ebchap:p375-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.