IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/bis/bisifc/31-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Financial soundness indicators (FSIs): framework and implementation

In: Proceedings of the IFC Conference on "Measuring financial innovation and its impact", Basel, 26-27 August 2008

Author

Listed:
  • Armida San Jose
  • Andreas Georgiou

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Armida San Jose & Andreas Georgiou, 2009. "Financial soundness indicators (FSIs): framework and implementation," IFC Bulletins chapters,in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Proceedings of the IFC Conference on "Measuring financial innovation and its impact", Basel, 26-27 August 2008, volume 31, pages 277-282 Bank for International Settlements.
  • Handle: RePEc:bis:bisifc:31-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.bis.org/ifc/publ/ifcb31v.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miroslav Misina, 2006. "Benchmark Index of Risk Appetite," Staff Working Papers 06-16, Bank of Canada.
    2. Miroslav Misina, 2003. "What does the risk-appetite index measure?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 28(6), pages 1-6.
    3. Coudert, V. & Gex, M., 2006. "Can risk aversion indicators anticipate financial crises?," Financial Stability Review, Banque de France, issue 9, pages 67-87, December.
    4. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:28:y:2003:i:6:p:a6 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malgorzata Olszak, 2012. "Macroprudential policy - aim, instruments and institutional architecture (Polityka ostroznosciowa w ujêciu makro - cel, instrumenty i architektura instytucjonalna)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 10(39), pages 7-32.
    2. Mayntz, Renate, 2017. "Zählen - Messen - Entscheiden: Wissen im politischen Prozess," MPIfG Discussion Paper 17/12, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisifc:31-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christian Beslmeisl). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.