BCII: Stata module to to estimate the number needed to treat (NNT) and confidence intervals for patients improving, or ‘benefiting’ (either improvements gained or deteriorations prevented), in a randomised controlled trial
Estimation of absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat for the difference between the proportion of improving patients in an intervention group and the proportion of improving patients a control group of a clinical trial. The package uses a method that is considered to have superior coverage properties to the conventional Wald method for calculating confidence intervals (Newcombe's Method 10); this may be important when reciprocally transforming absolute risk reductions to obtain numbers needed to treat (NNTs) as described by Bender, 2001. The program also estimates NNTs for benefit; the difference between the proportion of improving patients minus the proportion of deteriorating patients in the intervention group and the proportion of improving patients minus the proportion of deteriorating patients in the control group. Newcombe’s method 10 has been modified to incorporate these extra variance terms as described by Froud et al, 2009.
|Requires:||Stata version 10.1|
|Date of creation:||02 Jun 2009|
|Note:||This module should be installed from within Stata by typing "ssc install bcii". Windows users should not attempt to download these files with a web browser.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill MA 02467 USA|
Web page: http://fmwww.bc.edu/EC/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:||Web: http://repec.org/docs/ssc.php|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:bocode:s457053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.