IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/esthes/158025.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Information for All? The emergence of UNESCO’s policy discourse on the information society (1990-2003)

Author

Listed:
  • Pohle, Julia

Abstract

The dissertation analyses the emergence of UNESCO’s policy discourse on the information society between 1990 and 2003. Taking into account the historical, political and institutional background of UNESCO and its history in the field of information and communication, the empirical analysis focuses on three different policy processes that contributed to this policy discourse: the INFOethics conference series; the creation of UNESCO’s intergovernmental Information For All Programme (IFAP); and the preparation of the Recommendation concerning the promotion and use of multilingualism and universal access to cyberspace. The empirical research is based on an analytical framework that combines Argumentative Discourse Analysis (ADA) with selected concepts and tools from Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Building on extensive archive research and interviews, these approaches are combined in such a way as to make possible a detailed account of UNESCO’s policy-making and to analyse the emergence of its policy discourse on the information society as the outcome of discursive struggles among networks of actors.

Suggested Citation

  • Pohle, Julia, 2016. "Information for All? The emergence of UNESCO’s policy discourse on the information society (1990-2003)," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 158025, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esthes:158025
    Note: Dissertationsschrift / PhD Thesis, Faculty for Economics and Social Sciences, Department of Communication Studies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/158025/1/full-text-Pohle-Information_PhD_WZB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pohle, Julia, 2021. "International information policy: UNESCO in historical perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, pages 96-112.
    2. Martina Dattilo & Fabio Padovano & Yvon Rocaboy, 2020. "More is worse: Decreasing marginal quality of the Unesco World Heritage list," Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS 2020-01-ccr, Condorcet Center for political Economy.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esthes:158025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.