IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/diestu/80.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Forgotten or unpromising? The elusive phenomenon of under-aided countries, sectors and sub-national regions

Author

Listed:
  • Pietschmann, Elena

Abstract

The existence of under-aided countries, sectors, and sub-national regions – also known as “aid orphans” – implies inefficiencies in the current overall allocation of aid resources. This is of particular concern because aid effectiveness depends not only on how well resources are utilised, but also on how efficiently they are allocated across recipients and uses. Different conceptual approaches to aid allocation, as well as spillovers across countries and sectors, make it difficult to define an “optimal allocation” and thus to pin down the criteria for identifying cases of “insufficient aid”. Nevertheless, it is possible to identify countries whose aid receipts are considerably lower than others with similar characteristics, as well as sectors that receive insufficient aid while donors crowd in other areas. Donor coordination and transparency in aid allocations are crucial for addressing the problem and achieving a more efficient allocation of resources

Suggested Citation

  • Pietschmann, Elena, 2014. "Forgotten or unpromising? The elusive phenomenon of under-aided countries, sectors and sub-national regions," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 80, number 80.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diestu:80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199205/1/die-study-80.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Holzapfel, Sarah, 2014. "The role of indicators in development cooperation: an overview study with a special focus on the use of key and standard indicators," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 81, number 81.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diestu:80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.