IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/iie/piiebs/piieb26-2.html

US-China cooperative interdependence: Opportunities and obstacles

Editor

Listed:
  • Marcus Noland
    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Key Takeaways - US-China trade has shrunk and fragmented but cannot fully disentangle as both countries still rely on each other in critical supply chains. - In a GATT-inspired but modified approach, the US and China could negotiate a mutually acceptable reduction in their dependence on each other in technology and critical minerals without sabotaging each other. - Strained relations hinder coordinated action on shared goals of reducing emissions and developing clean energy technologies, preparing for future pandemics, and managing aging populations. Growing distrust and strategic rivalry between the US and China have shifted their relationship from mutually beneficial cooperation to costly conflict. The papers in this PIIE Briefing explore ways the two countries can pursue a structured, negotiated approach to economic disengagement while still collaborating on shared goals to address climate change, public health, and demographic challenges. Failure to find ways to cooperate--even while competing--will continue to hurt both economies and the rest of the world and also slow progress on tackling urgent global problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcus Noland (ed.), . "US-China cooperative interdependence: Opportunities and obstacles," PIIE Briefings, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number PIIEB26-2, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb26-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/piie-briefings/2026/us-china-cooperative-interdependence-opportunities-and-obstacles
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:piiebs:piieb26-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.