IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zna/indecs/v22y2024i1p59-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deep Learning in Science: Is there a Reason for (Philosophical) Pessimism?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Justin

    (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy, Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

In this article, I will review existing arguments for and against this philosophical pessimism about using deep learning models in science. Despite the remarkable results achieved by deep learning models networks in various scientific fields, some philosophers worry that because of their opacity, using these systems cannot improve our understanding of the phenomena studied. First, some terminological and conceptual clarification is provided. Then, I present a case for optimism, arguing that using opaque models does not hinder the possibility of gaining new understanding. After that, I present a critique of this argument. Finally, I present a case for pessimism, concluding that there are reasons to be pessimistic about the ability of deep learning models to provide us with new understanding of phenomena, studied by scientists.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Justin, 2024. "Deep Learning in Science: Is there a Reason for (Philosophical) Pessimism?," Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems - scientific journal, Croatian Interdisciplinary Society Provider Homepage: http://indecs.eu, vol. 22(1), pages 59-70.
  • Handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:22:y:2024:i:1:p:59-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.indecs.eu/2024/indecs2024-pp59-70.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    deep learning; scientific understanding; explanation; black box problem; artificial neural networks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zna:indecs:v:22:y:2024:i:1:p:59-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Josip Stepanic (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.