Author
Listed:
- Afe, A. I.
(Department of Crop Production, Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria.)
- Alagbe, Y.L.
(Department of Crop Production, Kwara State University, Malete, Nigeria.)
Abstract
Sorghum-okra intercropped at different population ratios and introduction periods were studied during the 2021 cropping season. Four population densities of okra (100 %, 75 %, 50 %, and 25 %) were introduced to sorghum three times [ same time (ST), two weeks before planting (2WBP) and two weeks after planting (2WAP)] in a factorial combination in a randomized complete block in split plot, replicated three times. Sole sorghum and okra were included in the treatments as a check. Regardless of population ratios, the yield of sorghum increased as the population density of okra decreased and with further delayed at the time of introduction. Land equivalent ratio (LER) demonstrated intercropping advantage at all population ratios and time of introduction. The area time equivalent ratio (ATER) index, however, indicated no meaningful intercropping advantage. Competitive ratio (CR) showed that okra was more competitive than sorghum when full populations of both crops were intercropped at all times of introduction. Interestingly, however, reduction in the population of okra to 75 % and below, sorghum was more competitive than okra. The Aggressivity (A) values were positive for okra and negative for sorghum when it was planted two weeks ahead of sorghum (2WBP). Monetary advantage (MA) was positive in all the treatments. The discrepancy and inconsistency among the indices for assessing intercropping efficiency suggest that using one index may be misleading and hence, an appropriate index should be used based on the objective of the grower.
Suggested Citation
Afe, A. I. & Alagbe, Y.L., 2025.
"Assessment Of Sorghum/Okra Intercrop Productivity, Competitive Behavior And Profitability In Southern Guinea Savannah Agroecology, Nigeria,"
Reviews in Food and Agriculture (RFNA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 6(1), pages 17-20, February.
Handle:
RePEc:zib:zbrfna:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:17-20
DOI: 10.26480/rfna.01.2025.17.20
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbrfna:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:17-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rfna.com.my/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.