IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbnmsm/v2y2018i2p15-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison Of Nalbuphine And Pentazocine In Controlling Post-Operative Pain In Dogs

Author

Listed:
  • Ameer Hamza Rabbani

    (Department of Surgery, Riphah College of Veterinary Science, Lahore, Pakistan.)

  • Khizar Hayat

    (Department of Anatomy and Histology, Riphah College of Veterinary Science, Lahore, Pakistan.)

  • Faizan Haider Gardezi

    (Department of Pathobiology, Riphah College of Veterinary Science, Lahore, Pakistan.)

  • Abdul Waheed

    (Department of Theriogenology, Riphah College of Veterinary Science, Lahore, Pakistan.)

  • Ambreen Zahra

    (Department of Pathobiology, Riphah College of Veterinary Science, Lahore, Pakistan.)

Abstract

Surgical success in most cases is governed by the quality of post-operative pain management. In Pakistan, most veterinary surgeons face a dire predicament as they fail astutely in this regard. Owing to the controlled dispensing of potent narcotics and their potential misuse, an imperative need for effective post-operative analgesic management of pain exists in dogs. 32 dogs were randomly divided into two groups. Group A was injected Nalbuphine @ 0.5 mg/kg post-operatively while Group B was injected Pentazocine @ 3mg/kg. Subjective and objective analysis of pain was conducted by unbiased observers. Vital signs (Temperature, pulse, respiration) were analyzed along with supplementation of hepatic and renal function tests. Objective and subjective analysis of both groups yielded results in the favor of pentazocine. In group A, temperature, pulse and respiration averaged 101.86±0.58oF, 83.46±2.75 per minute and 19.26±2.14 per minute respectively. Group 2 demonstrated temperature, pulse and respiration averages of 102.31±0.40oF, 83.41±2.74 per minute and 19.54±2.14 per minute respectively. Values of hepatic and renal function were also observed to be significantly higher in Nalbuphine treated group. All the results indicate that pentazocine is not only a significantly better analgesic but also has lower hepatotoxic and renal toxic effects.

Suggested Citation

  • Ameer Hamza Rabbani & Khizar Hayat & Faizan Haider Gardezi & Abdul Waheed & Ambreen Zahra, 2018. "A Comparison Of Nalbuphine And Pentazocine In Controlling Post-Operative Pain In Dogs," Matrix Science Medica (MSM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 15-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbnmsm:v:2:y:2018:i:2:p:15-20
    DOI: 10.26480/msm.02.2018.15.20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://matrixscmedica.com/download/622/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/msm.02.2018.15.20?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbnmsm:v:2:y:2018:i:2:p:15-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://matrixscmedica.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.