IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbmjsa/v5y2021i1p34-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated Land Cover And Terrain Analysis For Sustainable Land Use Planning At Watershed Scale: A Case Study Of Ban Dan Na Kham Watershed Of Northern Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Chike Onyeke Madueke

    (Department of Natural Resources Management, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Hengelosestraat 99, 7514 AE, Enschede, the Netherlands)

  • Dhruba Pikha Shrestha

    (Department of Applied Earth Sciences, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Hengelosestraat 99, 7514 AE, the Netherlands.)

  • Panagiotis Nyktas

    (Department of Natural Resources Management, Faculty of Geo-information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Hengelosestraat 99, 7514 AE, the Netherlands)

Abstract

Soil is a fundamental natural resource that is vital to the sustainable development of human societies. However, in many developing countries, increased intensity of use and inadequate land use planning has put a lot of pressure on marginal soil, leading to various forms of land degradation. The purpose of this study is to generate an integrated the land cover and terrain classification of the Ban Dan Na Kham watershed of Northern Thailand as a tool for sustainable land use planning. The watershed boundary and slope classes were delineated using the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) Digital Elevation Model (DEM). The slope was subsequently classified into gentle ( 30o). The land cover map was generated through the supervised classification of Sentinel2 satellite imagery. Both map products were then integrated to provide the basis for land allocation and land use planning. The results show that 58 % of land currently under arable farming is either marginally suitable or practically unsuitable for that purpose. This ultimately leads to increased land degradation and soil loss. The land should consequently be reforested. Nevertheless, up to 10 km2 of the watershed that is dedicated to other land use types – almost twice the current arable land area – is suitable for arable cropping. As such, given the proposed reforestation of the marginal and unsuitable arable lands, a large proportion of suitable land is still available to make up for the deficit. This will ultimately lead to increased productivity and reduced land degradation.

Suggested Citation

  • Chike Onyeke Madueke & Dhruba Pikha Shrestha & Panagiotis Nyktas, 2020. "Integrated Land Cover And Terrain Analysis For Sustainable Land Use Planning At Watershed Scale: A Case Study Of Ban Dan Na Kham Watershed Of Northern Thailand," Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Agriculture (MJSA), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(1), pages 34-42, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbmjsa:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:34-42
    DOI: 10.26480/mjsa.01.2021.34.42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://myjsustainagri.com/download/14469/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/mjsa.01.2021.34.42?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongsheng Zhang & Wen-Qi Luo & Shangzhao Yang & Jinna Yu, 2023. "Impact of Covid-19 on economic recovery: empirical analysis from China and global economies," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 57-78, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbmjsa:v:5:y:2021:i:1:p:34-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://myjsustainagri.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.