IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbfabm/v5y2024i2p79-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maize Post-Harvest Losses And Its Management Practices Adopted By Farmer In Gulmi District

Author

Listed:
  • Sweksha Pathak

    (Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 44209)

  • Susmita Adhikari

    (Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 44209)

  • Sanket Kattel

    (Department of Soil Science and Agriculture engineering, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Nepal)

  • Unish Nepali

    (Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 44209)

  • Ashmita Sapkota

    (Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 44209)

  • Sushmita Adhikari

    (Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal, 44209)

Abstract

The research entitled “Survey on Maize Post-Harvest Losses and Its Management Practices of Gulmi” was conducted in different wards of Satyawati Rural Municipality under PMAMP Gulmi from March to August 2023. The study aimed to identify maize post-harvest losses and assess the level of knowledge about post-harvest management of maize among the farmers of Gulmi. A household survey was conducted with 90 respondents using a pretested questionnaire. A two-stage sampling procedure was followed, with six out of eight wards of Satyawati in the district purposively selected in the first stage based on their predominance in maize production, according to information obtained from PMAMP, Gulmi. In the second stage, 15 active and contributing farmers were selected from each ward. The data were obtained and analyzed using descriptive statistics with the help of SPSS and MS Excel. The study revealed that 62% of respondents identified insects as the main problem in storage, whereas 11% indicated insects as the main problem in field conditions. Farmers ranked maize weevil as the most damaging insect, with an index value of 0.95. Improved varieties had a majority of weevil infestation (92.22%) in storage conditions. The degree of post-harvest losses was expressed differently by respondents. About 62.22% of farmers reported post-harvest losses of less than 10%, while 32.22% reported losses between 20-30%. A majority of respondents (100%) had not witnessed the occurrence of diseases. Most farmers (73.3%) stored their maize cobs with husks using open floors in the upper stair, known as “Aati.” A significant proportion of farmers (84.4%) had knowledge of managing field and storage pests. Around 73.3% of farmers adopted sun drying as their pest management technique, while 62.2% used chemical pesticides against storage pests. More training was provided to farmers on production-related topics than on post-harvest management. Thus, the study area requires technical support for managing insect pests and diseases.

Suggested Citation

  • Sweksha Pathak & Susmita Adhikari & Sanket Kattel & Unish Nepali & Ashmita Sapkota & Sushmita Adhikari, 2024. "Maize Post-Harvest Losses And Its Management Practices Adopted By Farmer In Gulmi District," Food & Agribusiness Management (FABM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 5(2), pages 79-85, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbfabm:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:79-85
    DOI: 10.26480/fabm.01.2024.79.85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fabm.org.my/archive/2fabm2024/2fabm2024-79-85.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/fabm.01.2024.79.85?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbfabm:v:5:y:2024:i:2:p:79-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Zibeline International Publishing to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://fabm.org.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.