IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zib/zbfabm/v2y2021i2p92-95.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficacy Of Commercial Insecticide For The Management Of Cowpea Pod Borer (Maruca Vitrata) On Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp) Under Field Condition In Chitwan, Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Chudamani Pant

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan.)

  • Rajendra Regmi

    (Department of Entomology, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan.)

  • Sagar Bhusal

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan)

  • Shrawan Yadav

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan)

  • Sapana Tiwari

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan)

  • Pratikshya Wagle

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan)

  • Manish Bhandari

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Agriculture and Forestry University, Rampur, Chitwan)

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of commercially available insecticides for management of cowpea pod borer to know about the effective and safe chemical insecticide to manage the cow pea pod borer. A total of five treatments; (i. Neemix (2ml/L), ii. Flubendamide 48% SC (2ml/L), iii. Spinosad 45% SC (3ml/L), iv. Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC(2ml/L) and v. control) were tested using Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replications for each treatment. The results showed that the Chlorantraniliprole 18.5% SC was most effective to reduce cowpea pod borer larva followed by Flubendamide 48% SC and Spinosad 45% SC. The damage of pod by cowpea pod borer was recorded the highest control plot (20.53%) whereas lowest fruit damage was recorded Chlorantraniliprole (5.18%) followed by Flubendamide (5.44%). Among the treatments, the highest yield was obtained with Chlorantraniliprole (11.22mt/ha) followed by Flubendamide (9.21mt/ha) and Spinosad (8.27/ha). Whereas the lowest yield was obtained with control plot (6.59mt/ha) followed by Neemix (7.09mt/ha) treated plots. The benefit-cost (B:C) ratio for all the treatments revealed that chlorantraniliprole @ 0.2ml/L was highly economical with a B:C of 1:62.14 followed by spinosad with 1: 21.91. The chlorantraniliprole resulted the lowest larval count, lowest fruit damage, highest yield and highest marginal B: C thus could be the best insecticide to manage cowpea pod borer.

Suggested Citation

  • Chudamani Pant & Rajendra Regmi & Sagar Bhusal & Shrawan Yadav & Sapana Tiwari & Pratikshya Wagle & Manish Bhandari, 2021. "Efficacy Of Commercial Insecticide For The Management Of Cowpea Pod Borer (Maruca Vitrata) On Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp) Under Field Condition In Chitwan, Nepal," Food & Agribusiness Management (FABM), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 2(2), pages 92-95, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:zib:zbfabm:v:2:y:2021:i:2:p:92-95
    DOI: 10.26480/fabm.02.2021.92.95
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://fabm.org.my/download/873/
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26480/fabm.02.2021.92.95?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zib:zbfabm:v:2:y:2021:i:2:p:92-95. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zibeline International Publishing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://fabm.org.my/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.