IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/jumsac/334181.html

A new dimension of transparency: ESG disclosure and its effect on shareholder behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Keserü, Tobias

Abstract

This study examines the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure (ESGD) on a company's ownership structure in predominantly developed economies. It aims to assess whether ESGD influences the shares held by different investor types, with a focus on institutional investors. Using data from 2016 to 2022, ESGD is measured relatively and absolutely, while ownership is categorized into corporate, government, individual, and institutional types. A multivariate regression assesses the overall impact, and a univariate regression specifically examines the effect on institutional ownership. The analysis reveals a significant link between ESGD and ownership structure, suggesting that ESGD shapes ownership dynamics. In particular, institutional investors respond positively to relative ESGD, valuing how a company's ESG transparency compares to its peers. The study acknowledges limitations like the short time frame and potential biases in the database. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that companies can attract institutional investors by improving ESG transparency, even if actual ESG outcomes are modest. This research contributes to the understanding of how ESG transparency shapes investor behavior, offering valuable insights for companies, investors, and policymakers.

Suggested Citation

  • Keserü, Tobias, 2025. "A new dimension of transparency: ESG disclosure and its effect on shareholder behavior," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(4), pages 876-903.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:334181
    DOI: 10.5282/jums/v10i4pp876-903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/334181/1/1945735694.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5282/jums/v10i4pp876-903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513570210435889 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Amihud, Yakov & Mendelson, Haim, 1986. "Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 223-249, December.
    3. Markus J. Milne & Dennis M. Patten, 2002. "Securing organizational legitimacy," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 372-405, August.
    4. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    5. Belkhir, Mohamed & Saad, Mohsen & Samet, Anis, 2020. "Stock extreme illiquidity and the cost of capital," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. R.M. Haniffa & T. E. Cooke, 2002. "Culture, Corporate Governance and Disclosure in Malaysian Corporations," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 38(3), pages 317-349, October.
    7. Amir Barnea & Amir Rubin, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Conflict Between Shareholders," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 97(1), pages 71-86, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelidis, Timotheos & Michairinas, Athanasios & Sakkas, Athanasios, 2024. "World ESG performance and economic activity," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    2. Elena Ferrer & Francisco J. López‐Arceiz & Cristina del Rio, 2020. "Sustainability disclosure and financial analysts' accuracy: The European case," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 2939-2952, December.
    3. Li, WeiWei & Padmanabhan, Prasad & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2024. "ESG and debt structure: Is the nature of this relationship nonlinear?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    4. Stephen J. Smulowitz & Didier Cossin & Hongze Lu, 2023. "Managerial Short-Termism and Corporate Social Performance: The Moderating Role of External Monitoring," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 759-778, December.
    5. Yuan Zheng & Mazni Abdullah & Nurliana Md Rahin, 2025. "Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Performance and New Quality Productivity in China: The Mediating Role of Patient Capital," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, November.
    6. Sylvain Marsat & Guillaume Pijourlet & Muhammad Ullah, 2021. "Is there a trade‐off between environmental performance and financial resilience? International evidence from the subprime crisis," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(3), pages 4061-4084, September.
    7. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    8. Sajid Ullah & Farman Ullah Khan & Laura-Mariana Cismaș & Muhammad Usman & Andra Miculescu, 2022. "Do Tournament Incentives Matter for CEOs to Be Environmentally Responsible? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    9. Ali, Searat & Liu, Benjamin & Su, Jen Je, 2017. "Corporate governance and stock liquidity dimensions: Panel evidence from pure order-driven Australian market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 275-304.
    10. Chieh-Jung Chan & Ping-Fang Yen & Hsin-Wen Wang & Yuan Chang, 2026. "ESG Performance and Bank Loan Interest Rates," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 1-4.
    11. Mohammad Jizi, 2017. "The Influence of Board Composition on Sustainable Development Disclosure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 640-655, July.
    12. Tao Bing & Meng Li, 2019. "Does CSR Signal the Firm Value? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-22, August.
    13. Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, Emawtee & Brooks, Robert & Do, Hung Xuan, 2023. "ESG and firm performance: The role of size and media channels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    14. McGuinness, Paul B. & Vieito, João Paulo & Wang, Mingzhu, 2024. "The impact of CSR-engagement, board gender, and stock price synchronicity on female analyst stock coverage decisions," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. McGuinness, Paul B. & Vieito, João Paulo & Wang, Mingzhu, 2017. "The role of board gender and foreign ownership in the CSR performance of Chinese listed firms," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 75-99.
    16. Bhattarai, Keshab & Prasuna, Asha & Kumar, SNV Siva, 2024. "Structural Risk Modelling- Indian Mergers & Acquisitions," MPRA Paper 123385, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Jan 2025.
    17. Banerjee, Rajabrata & Gupta, Kartick & Krishnamurti, Chandrasekhar, 2022. "Does corrupt practice increase the implied cost of equity?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    18. Pochara Arayakarnkul & Pattanaporn Chatjuthamard & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2022. "Board gender diversity, corporate social commitment and sustainability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1706-1721, September.
    19. Rohan Kumar Mishra & Frank Obenpong Kwabi & Abhijeet Chandra, 2025. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Related Party Transaction and Earnings Management: Evidence from India," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 201(2), pages 331-369, October.
    20. Abdalla Shwairef & Azlan Amran & Mohammad Iranmanesh & Noor Hazlina Ahmad, 2021. "The mediating effect of strategic posture on corporate governance and environmental reporting," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 349-378, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:jumsac:334181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jums.academy/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.