IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/343608.html

Homophily in grant evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Fuchs-Schündeln, Nicola
  • Holub, Felix

Abstract

Funding agencies play a central role in science by awarding grants to researchers. Grant review can be influenced by bias, including preferences for applicants who share reviewers’ gender, country or citizenship. Using 37,073 applications for European Research Council grants with multiple reviews per proposal, we show that reviewers who share an applicant’s country of work or citizenship award higher scores than reviewers with no such match. This effect is strongest when both country and citizenship align. Shared gender increases scores to a smaller extent. Further analyses indicate that these findings are unlikely to be driven by shared tastes or informational advantages. At the panel level, correlational evidence shows that applicants are more likely to advance past the first stage when the chair or more panel members share their country of work or citizenship. Country of work and citizenship may therefore be relevant sources of bias in international grant review.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuchs-Schündeln, Nicola & Holub, Felix, 2026. "Homophily in grant evaluations," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:343608
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-026-02554-w
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/343608/1/Full-text-article-Fuchs-Schuendeln-Holub-Homophily.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-026-02554-w?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:343608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.