IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/325861.html

Work arrangements in digitally mediated care and domestic work

Author

Listed:
  • Molitor, Friederike

Abstract

As the need for care has grown, paid care and domestic work in the private home is increasingly being organised on the market. Today, digital platforms serve as intermediaries for care and domestic services but systematic research on the resulting work arrangements between workers and clients remains limited. By understanding platform-mediated care and domestic work arrangements as a (social) exchange of ‘love and money’ between workers and clients, the study explores the working conditions and the worker-client relationships that emerge. Drawing on unique survey data collected on a large digital platform in Germany in 2019, the study shows that care and domestic workers who offer their services on digital platforms often experience informal work arrangements characterised by low working hours and irregular shifts. The worker-client relationships are described as amicable more than professional. They are often built on continuity, long-termism and reliability, which are essential for a lasting relationship. This challenges the ondemand, economic logic characterising other forms of platform work.

Suggested Citation

  • Molitor, Friederike, 2025. "Work arrangements in digitally mediated care and domestic work," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue Latest ar, pages 1-20.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:325861
    DOI: 10.1080/13668803.2025.2523863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/325861/1/Full-text-article-Molitor-Work-arrangements.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13668803.2025.2523863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancy Folbre & Julie A. Nelson, 2000. "For Love or Money--Or Both?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 123-140, Fall.
    2. Enste, Dominik, 2019. "Haushaltshilfe: Keine Entlastung in Sicht," IW-Kurzberichte 42/2019, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.
    3. Folbre, Nancy, 1994. "Children as Public Goods," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 84(2), pages 86-90, May.
    4. Paula McDonald & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes, 2021. "Means of Control in the Organization of Digitally Intermediated Care Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(5), pages 872-890, October.
    5. Laura Wiesböck & Julia Radlherr & Mai Linh Angelique Vo, 2023. "Domestic Cleaners in the Informal Labour Market: New Working Realities Shaped by the Gig Economy?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 262-273.
    6. Laura Wiesböck & Julia Radlherr & Mai Linh Angelique Vo, 2023. "Domestic Cleaners in the Informal Labour Market: New Working Realities Shaped by the Gig Economy?," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 262-273.
    7. De Stefano, Valerio., 2016. "The rise of the "just-in-time workforce" : on-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the "gig-economy"," ILO Working Papers 994899823402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antigone Lyberaki, 2008. "“Deae ex Machina”: migrant women, care work and women’s employment in Greece," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 20, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    2. Ivana PAIS & Arianna MARCOLIN, 2024. "Digital platforms in the Italian domestic care sector: The emergence of an unprecedented corporate logic and its implications for workers' social protection," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 163(3), pages 397-415, September.
    3. Lyberaki, Antigone, 2008. "“Deae ex Machina”: migrant women, care work and women’s employment in Greece," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 23183, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. François-Xavier Devetter, 2016. "Can Public Policies Bring about the Democratization of the Outsourcing of Household Tasks?," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 48(3), pages 365-393, September.
    5. Mary Eschelbach Hansen & Paul Jacobs, 2007. "Valuing Substitute Families:Financial Support for Foster and Adoptive Families," Working Papers 2007-04, American University, Department of Economics.
    6. Marina Della Giusta & Nigar Hashimzade & Sarah Jewell, 2011. "Why Care? Social Norms, Relative Income and the Supply of Unpaid Care," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2011-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    7. Marina Della Giusta & Zella King, 2010. "Time Packages and Their Effect on Life Satisfaction," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2010-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    8. Motkuri, Venkatanarayana, 2006. "Child Labour and Educational Deprivation of Children : A Review of Literature," MPRA Paper 48437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Michele Cantarella & Chiara Strozzi, 2021. "Workers in the crowd: the labor market impact of the online platform economy [An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(6), pages 1429-1458.
    10. Fenglin Zhang, 2026. "The labor theory of value in the era of artificial intelligence and digital platforms: challenges, innovations, and new mechanisms," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Steven Ruggles, 2015. "Patriarchy, Power, and Pay: The Transformation of American Families, 1800–2015," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(6), pages 1797-1823, December.
    12. Bridgman, Benjamin & Duernecker, Georg & Herrendorf, Berthold, 2018. "Structural transformation, marketization, and household production around the world," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 102-126.
    13. Angela Garcia Calvo & Martin Kenney & John Zysman, 2023. "Understanding work in the online platform economy: the narrow, the broad, and the systemic perspectives," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 32(4), pages 795-814.
    14. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Peter Bohmer & Savvina Chowdhury & Robin Hahnel, 2020. "Reproductive Labor in a Participataory Socialist Society," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 52(4), pages 755-771, December.
    16. Julie A. Nelson, 2013. "Gender and caring," Chapters, in: Deborah M. Figart & Tonia L. Warnecke (ed.), Handbook of Research on Gender and Economic Life, chapter 5, pages 62-76, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Navajas-Romero, Virginia & Muñoz-Benito, Rocío & Sánchez-Rodríguez, M. Isabel, 2026. "Rethinking job dimensions: The value of riders and gig economy workers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    18. Orazem, Peter F. & King, Elizabeth M., 2008. "Schooling in Developing Countries: The Roles of Supply, Demand and Government Policy," Handbook of Development Economics, in: T. Paul Schultz & John A. Strauss (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 55, pages 3475-3559, Elsevier.
    19. Valerio De Stefano & Antonio Aloisi, 2018. "European legal framework for "digital labour platforms"," JRC Research Reports JRC112243, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Parker, Owen N. & Mui, Rachel & Bhawe, Nachiket & Semadeni, Matthew, 2022. "Insight or ignorance: How collaborative history in a workgroup fits with project type to shape performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 154-167.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:325861. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.