IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/busexc/v17y2023i2p56-71.html

The Impact Of Marketing Activities On Children'S Healthy Food Choices

Author

Listed:
  • David Skala

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, Trg J. F. Kennedyja 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Dora Gaćeša

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, Trg J. F. Kennedyja 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

  • Ružica Brečić

    (University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics & Business, Trg J. F. Kennedyja 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

Purpose: Within marketing and consumer research, prior studies have often tackled children's decisions concerning food in a fragmented manner, either by looking solely at attitudes or behaviours. Such an approach restricts the comprehensive comprehension of children as consumers. This study examines how marketing actions (specifically, the word claim used) help encourage children to prefer healthier choices. Design/methodology/Approach: 215 children, aged 6 to 9, took part in a simulated food choice task, with participants drawn from two schools in Zagreb. Parents gave their written informed consent for their child's involvement in the study. Findings and implications: The results emphasise the significant role of specific word claims like “healthy", “popular" and “tasty" or emoticons “smiley”, “heart” and “muscle” in influencing children's food choices. Utilising these claims increases the likelihood of children opting for healthier food options. These insights hold practical implications for crafting interventions that promote healthier eating habits in children. Limitations: Hypothetical food choices may not fully represent children's behaviours in real-life settings. Exploring alternative labelling strategies beyond word claims would allow for comparisons and identification of effective methods to motivate healthy choices. Originality: By investigating the impact of marketing activities on children's healthy food choices, this study introduced an innovative perspective, focusing on the effectiveness of word claims and emoticons as labelling strategies. These results enhance our comprehension of the factors influencing children's dietary decisions and provide a basis for developing interventions to cultivate healthier eating habits.

Suggested Citation

  • David Skala & Dora Gaćeša & Ružica Brečić, 2023. "The Impact Of Marketing Activities On Children'S Healthy Food Choices," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 17(2), pages 56-71.
    • Handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:56-71
    DOI: 10.22598/pi-be/2023.17.2.55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/448930
    Download Restriction: None
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22598/pi-be/2023.17.2.55?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goldberg, Marvin E & Gorn, Gerald J & Gibson, Wendy, 1978. "TV Messages for Snack and Breakfast Foods: Do They Influence Children's Preferences?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 5(2), pages 73-81, Se.
    2. John A. List & Ragan Petrie & Anya Samek, 2023. "How Experiments with Children Inform Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 61(2), pages 504-564, June.
    3. Hummel, Dennis & Maedche, Alexander, 2019. "How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 47-58.
    4. Mecheva, Margarita de Vries & Rieger, Matthias & Sparrow, Robert & Prafiantini, Erfi & Agustina, Rina, 2021. "Snacks, nudges and asymmetric peer influence: Evidence from food choice experiments with children in Indonesia," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Gorn, Gerald J & Goldberg, Marvin E, 1982. "Behavioral Evidence on the Effects of Televised Food Messages on Children," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 9(2), pages 200-205, September.
    6. Valérie Hémar-Nicolas & Pascale Ezan, 2019. "How do children make sense of food well-being? Food for thought for responsible retailers," Post-Print hal-04154612, HAL.
    7. Romain Cadario & Pierre Chandon, 2020. "Which Healthy Eating Nudges Work Best? A Meta-Analysis of Field Experiments," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 465-486, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bauer, Jan M. & Aarestrup, Simon C. & Hansen, Pelle G. & Reisch, Lucia A., 2022. "Nudging more sustainable grocery purchases: Behavioural innovations in a supermarket setting," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Shari De Baets & Dilek Önkal & Wasim Ahmed, 2022. "Do Risky Scenarios Affect Forecasts of Savings and Expenses?," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Marvin M. Müller & Kim Leonardo Böhm & Erich Renz, 2023. "Pay or nudge employees into change? A theoretical and experimental investigation of the effect of nudging for organizational change," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(6), pages 3666-3695, September.
    4. Ortiz, Jose M. & Teixeira, Lucas I. & Falcão, Natália N.L. & Soki, Erika A. & Almeida, Raquel M., 2024. "Information simplification and default choices improve financial decisions: A credit card statement experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    5. Livingstone, Sonia & Helsper, Ellen, 2004. "Advertising foods to children: Understanding promotion in the context of children's daily lives. A review of the literature prepared for the Research Department of the Office of Communications (OFCOM)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 21757, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Caso, Gerarda & Sapio, Silvia & Vecchio, Riccardo, 2025. "Low-income citizens’ evaluation of policy interventions to promote healthy food choices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    7. Christine Kawa & Wim H. Gijselaers & Jan F. H. Nijhuis & Patrizia M. Ianiro-Dahm, 2022. "Are You “Nudgeable”? Factors Affecting the Acceptance of Healthy Eating Nudges in a Cafeteria Setting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Dominic Lemken & Ainslee Erhard & Simone Wahnschafft, 2024. "A choice architect’s guide to the (autonomous) galaxy: a systematic scoping review of nudge intrusiveness in food choices," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Ana Balsa & Cecilia Noboa & Patricia Triunfo, 2024. "Nudging healthy food choices through e‐messages in a supermarket," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(8), pages 1705-1725, August.
    10. Alempaki, Despoina & Isoni, Andrea & Read, Daniel, 2023. "Tainted nudge," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Giulia Andreani & Rungsaran Wongprawmas & Beatrice Biasini & Alice Rosi & Cinzia Franchini & Irina Dolgopolova & Cristina Mora & Davide Menozzi & Francesca Scazzina & Miguel I. Gómez & Jutta Roosen & , 2024. "Digital nudging at the university canteen: an online study with American young adults," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.
    12. Christine Kawa & Patrizia M. Ianiro-Dahm & Jan F. H. Nijhuis & Wim H. Gijselaers, 2021. "Cafeteria Online: Nudges for Healthier Food Choices in a University Cafeteria—A Randomized Online Experiment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Yu Gao & Massimo Tavoni, 2024. "Forget-Me-Not: The Persistent Effect of Information Provision for Adopting Climate-Friendly Goods," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4480-4501, July.
    14. Stephen L. Cheung & Agnieszka Tymula & Xueting Wang, 2022. "Present bias for monetary and dietary rewards," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1202-1233, September.
    15. Jessica M. Williams & Vivian H. Y. Chu & Wai Fung Lam & Winnie W. Y. Law & Sik Tung Ho, 2025. "Nudging Into the Future of Immersive Reality: A Systematic Review of Sustainability‐Orientated Nudges in Policy and the Future Role of Extended Reality (XR)," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 9303-9324, December.
    16. repec:ags:aaea22:335733 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Qi, Danyi & Li, Ran & Penn, Jerrod & Houghtaling, Bailey & Prinyawiwatkul, Witoon & Roe, Brian E., 2021. "Does Nudging More Vegetable Consumption Result in More Waste? Evidence from a Randomized Dining Experiment," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313980, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Stefano DellaVigna & Elizabeth Linos, 2022. "RCTs to Scale: Comprehensive Evidence From Two Nudge Units," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 81-116, January.
    19. Nils Engelbrecht & Tim-Benjamin Lembcke & Alfred Benedikt Brendel & Kilian Bizer & Lutz M. Kolbe, 2021. "The Virtual Online Supermarket: An Open-Source Research Platform for Experimental Consumer Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Pozharliev, Rumen & De Angelis, Matteo & Rossi, Dario & Bagozzi, Richard & Amatulli, Cesare, 2023. "I might try it: Marketing actions to reduce consumer disgust toward insect-based food," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 149-167.
    21. Ina Ganguli & Marieke Huysentruyt & Chloé Le Coq, 2021. "How Do Nascent Social Entrepreneurs Respond to Rewards? A Field Experiment on Motivations in a Grant Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(10), pages 6294-6316, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:17:y:2023:i:2:p:56-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dario Dunković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.