IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ysm/ypfsfc/331919.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Korean Capital Injections: KDIC 1997

Author

Abstract

After the devaluation of the Thai baht in July 1997, international banks reduced their exposures to Korean financial institutions, rating agencies downgraded Korea's sovereign rating, and the Korean won lost half its value. The government guaranteed all financial institution deposits and provided emergency liquidity support to the financial sector, but these measures did not restore market confidence. In December, Korea sought an International Monetary Fund (IMF) Stand-by Arrangement. As part of the IMF program, the Korean National Assembly consolidated financial sector supervision into a new Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) and broadened the scope of the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation (KDIC). The KDIC injected capital into both bank and nonbank financial institutions, beginning with the largest banks in January 1998. The first round of capital injections, between January 1998 and August 2000, focused on financial sector restructuring. The second round, between September 2000 and September 2002, focused on resolving insolvent financial institutions and improving financial supervision and corporate governance. From 2003 onward, the KDIC's deposit insurance fund was divided into a new deposit insurance fund and a restructuring fund dedicated to ad hoc crisis-related activities. Through 2018, the KDIC and other agencies injected a total KRW 82 trillion of capital by contributing capital directly and purchasing subordinated debt, common stock, and preferred equity. Funded by government-guaranteed bonds, the KDIC injected capital into insured financial institutions, including banks, merchant banks, securities companies, mutual savings banks, and insurance companies. The Korean government argued that the first round of restructuring had succeeded in reducing systemic risk by resolving nonviable institutions and injecting capital into viable ones. Recurring criticisms include concerns with moral hazard and the Korean government's asymmetric focus on the banking sector. By year-end 2018, the KDIC had recouped about KRW 50 trillion of the KRW 69.4 trillion it spent on capital injections.

Suggested Citation

  • Kulam, Adam, 2021. "Korean Capital Injections: KDIC 1997," Journal of Financial Crises, Yale Program on Financial Stability (YPFS), vol. 3(3), pages 367-421, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ysm:ypfsfc:331919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1206&context=journal-of-financial-crises
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Choi, 2000. "The Macroeconomic Implications of Regulatory Capital Adequacy Requirements for Korean Banks," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 29(1), pages 111-143, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Redo, 2015. "The importance of prudential regulations in the process of transmitting monetary policy to economy," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 4(2), pages 145-158.
    2. John J. Seater, 2000. "Optimal Bank Regulation and Monetary Policy," Center for Financial Institutions Working Papers 00-38, Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania.
    3. Misa Tanaka, 2002. "How Do Bank Capital and Capital Adequacy Regulation Affect the Monetary Transmission Mechanism?," CESifo Working Paper Series 799, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Crisis; bank resolution; capital contribution; capital injections; equity participation; financial restructuring; KDIC; Korea;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ysm:ypfsfc:331919. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/smyalus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.