IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wut/journl/v32y2022i2p125-136id8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project practitioner experience in risk ranking analysis – an empirical study in Malaysia and Singapore

Author

Listed:
  • Der-Jiun Pang
  • Kamran Shavarebi
  • Sokchoo Ng

Abstract

Despite the Information Technology (IT) sector’s continuing growth driving massive demand for IT project practitioners, the high failure rate of IT projects has caused enormous losses for many organizations. Establishing effective and proactive practice for project risk management (PRM) is imperative. Risk exposure scoring is becoming a critical risk classifier in prioritizing items in descending order, developing plans to address the most significant factors, and leaving the rest on a “watch list”. This study analyzes responses from targeted project managers (PM) in Malaysia- Singapore to a survey. The author ranked the intrinsic risk of projects and investigated the effect of a project practitioner’s level of experience in risk assessment. The results indicated that a project practitioner’s assessments of risk depend on the number of years of experience acquired.

Suggested Citation

  • Der-Jiun Pang & Kamran Shavarebi & Sokchoo Ng, 2022. "Project practitioner experience in risk ranking analysis – an empirical study in Malaysia and Singapore," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 32(2), pages 125-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:32:y:2022:i:2:p:125-136:id:8
    DOI: 10.37190/ord220208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ord.pwr.edu.pl/assets/papers_archive/ord2022vol32no2_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.37190/ord220208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wut:journl:v:32:y:2022:i:2:p:125-136:id:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Kasperski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iopwrpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.