IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/serxxx/v66y2021i04ns0217590820490065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Government Spending On Education Affect Provincial Income Inequality In Vietnam?

Author

Listed:
  • CHI MINH HO

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, Ward 6, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • QUAN THAI-THUONG LE

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, Ward 6, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • ANH THE VO

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, Ward 6, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • DUC HONG VO

    (Business and Economics Research Group, Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 97 Vo Van Tan Street, Ward 6, District 3, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • DAO THI-THIEU HA

    (��Faculty of International Economics, Banking University Ho Chi Minh City, 56 Hoang Dieu 2 Street, Thu Duc District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

Abstract

This study is conducted to examine the effect on income inequality of government spending on education across 63 provinces in Vietnam. The generalized method of moments (GMM) regression technique is used to address potential endogeneity in the model caused by income inequality and inequality in government spending on education. Income inequality is proxied by both the Gini coefficient and the Theil index. Inequality in government spending on education in Vietnam is estimated using a novel entropic approach, which decomposes the inequality into two components: “within-province†inequality and “between-province†inequality. Data for the period from 2010 to 2016 are used. Our empirical findings are summarized as follows. First, “within-province†inequality accounts for a substantial portion of inequality in government spending on education. This means that although the Vietnamese national government has done well in terms of allocating spending on education across 63 provinces, inequality in education spending appears across districts within provinces. Second, both total inequality of government spending on education and its two components are positively associated with income inequality across provinces. As such, reducing differences in government spending on education across provinces and across districts within provinces is an effective mechanism for reducing income inequality across provinces and across districts within provinces in Vietnam.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Minh Ho & Quan Thai-Thuong Le & Anh The Vo & Duc Hong Vo & Dao Thi-Thieu Ha, 2021. "Does Government Spending On Education Affect Provincial Income Inequality In Vietnam?," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 66(04), pages 1105-1123, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:66:y:2021:i:04:n:s0217590820490065
    DOI: 10.1142/S0217590820490065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0217590820490065
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0217590820490065?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong, Shizheng & Zhang, Zili & Han, Yiduo & Si, Yanwu, 2023. "Do pension subsidies reduce household education expenditure inequality? Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 532-540.
    2. Durongkaveroj, Wannaphong, 2022. "Structural Transformation, Income Inequality and Government Expenditure: Evidence from International Panel Data," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 56(3), pages 29-44.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:serxxx:v:66:y:2021:i:04:n:s0217590820490065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ser/ser.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.