IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v16y2014i01ns1464333214500045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resolution-Less Conflict And Shifting Alignments In Municipal Air Toxics Disputes: The Case Of Houston Under The White Administration, 2004–2009

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHEN H. LINDER

    (The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States)

  • REBECCA J. BRUHL

    (The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States)

  • KEN SEXTON

    (The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas, United States)

Abstract

Convinced that state and national regulatory bodies were not doing enough to control airborne toxic pollution, the City of Houston, Texas, led by a newly elected Mayor, implemented an aggressive pollution-reduction campaign from 2004–2008. The City provoked controversy over the presence and extent of an air toxics problem in Houston, first, by contesting the meaning of available scientific evidence, and then, by advocating for more stringent regulatory controls to address it. The controversy involved many different participants, and a shift from their ex ante consensus, as each was moved to support its claims with analyses and re-interpretations of scientific evidence. The City's attempt to expand its role in the regulation of air toxics, in large part through discursive means, met with considerable resistance and prompted realignments among participants. This case study examines how this came about, highlights the unorthodox features of the dispute and accounts for the absence of a conventional consensus-based resolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen H. Linder & Rebecca J. Bruhl & Ken Sexton, 2014. "Resolution-Less Conflict And Shifting Alignments In Municipal Air Toxics Disputes: The Case Of Houston Under The White Administration, 2004–2009," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(01), pages 1-21.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:16:y:2014:i:01:n:s1464333214500045
    DOI: 10.1142/S1464333214500045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333214500045
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1464333214500045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:16:y:2014:i:01:n:s1464333214500045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.