IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/jeapmx/v02y2000i01ns1464333200000084.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application Of Limiting Marginal Abatement Costs In Optimised Strategies To Reduce Acidification And Eutrophication In Europe: Illustrations Using The Abatement Strategies Assessment Model (Asam)

Author

Listed:
  • RACHEL F. WARREN

    (Air Pollution Group, T. H. Huxley School for Environment, Earth Sciences and Engineering, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2PE, UK)

  • HELEN M. APSIMON

    (Air Pollution Group, T. H. Huxley School for Environment, Earth Sciences and Engineering, Imperial College, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2PE, UK)

Abstract

The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution has led to the setting up of international protocols to reduce emissions of oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, ammonia, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Policy makers have made use of optimised abatement strategies derived by integrated assessment models (IAMs) which cost-effectively reduce acidification, eutrophication and tropospheric ozone. IAMs use information on costs of potential emission abatement options in individual countries. This paper explores the implications of limiting the abatement options in IAMs to those with moderate marginal costs. Three methods of applying this constraint to the optimisation are described. All methods indicate a loss of cost-effectiveness, this being most severe when marginal costs are constrained and environmental constraints are not compromised. However, when the overall investment level is capped and the strategy re-optimised taking into account marginal cost limitation whilst allowing violation of the original environmental targets, the loss of cost-effectiveness is less severe. For all three methods, significant changes occur in patterns of country expenditures and environmental protection, which tends to decrease significantly in those areas most difficult to protect. However, the re-optimisation method does provide the opportunity for "compensating" improvements to be achieved in other areas which are easier to protect. The choice of marginal cost limits strongly affects the extent and nature of these changes, as does the nature of the original optimised strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel F. Warren & Helen M. Apsimon, 2000. "Application Of Limiting Marginal Abatement Costs In Optimised Strategies To Reduce Acidification And Eutrophication In Europe: Illustrations Using The Abatement Strategies Assessment Model (Asam)," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 2(01), pages 119-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:02:y:2000:i:01:n:s1464333200000084
    DOI: 10.1142/S1464333200000084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1464333200000084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1464333200000084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joe O'Doherty & Karen Mayor & Richard S.J. Tol, 2007. "Irish Sustainable Development Model (ISus): Literature Review, Data Availability and Model Design," Papers WP186, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    2. Willemijn Tuinstra, 2008. "European air pollution assessments: co-production of science and policy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 35-49, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:jeapmx:v:02:y:2000:i:01:n:s1464333200000084. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/jeapm/jeapm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.