IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijmpcx/v31y2020i09ns012918312050120x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simulation of pedestrian counter flow with conflicting preference using a lattice-based simulation model

Author

Listed:
  • Kongjin Zhu

    (School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, P. R. China)

  • Jun Wang

    (School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, P. R. China)

  • Ning Guo

    (School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, P. R. China)

  • Zhongjun Ding

    (School of Automotive and Transportation Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, P. R. China)

  • Peng Mei

    (The 38th Research Institute of China Electronics, Technology Group Corporation, Hefei 230088, P. R. China)

Abstract

Pedestrian counter flows widely exist in public pedestrian facilities such as corridors, sidewalks, signalized crossings and so on. There is one specific flow in real life, namely counter flow with conflicting walking preference which often occurs in the case of presence of one-sidedly asymmetry due to shadows, light, snow and so on. It is often overlooked in practice and the related studies are still limited. In this study, to better understand the flow dynamics of pedestrian flow with various walking preference, a simple lattice-based model was proposed in which position exchange and walking preference were simultaneously considered. Specifically, simulations including pedestrian counter flow with preference (Case A), with conflicting preference (Case B), and without preference (Basic case) were performed. Results show that the presented model can capture some essential features of pedestrian counter flow with various walking preference. It is not always necessary to intervene the behavior of pedestrians’ conflicting preference, since appropriate degree of preference is sometimes beneficial to movement of pedestrians. In addition, with the significant influence of position exchange, the flow in Case A with more orderly motion is more efficient in the context of low density, while the flow in Case B with more frequent interactions is more efficient in the case of high density. The findings in this study will be helpful in crowd management as well as the design and operation of pedestrian facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Kongjin Zhu & Jun Wang & Ning Guo & Zhongjun Ding & Peng Mei, 2020. "Simulation of pedestrian counter flow with conflicting preference using a lattice-based simulation model," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 31(09), pages 1-19, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijmpcx:v:31:y:2020:i:09:n:s012918312050120x
    DOI: 10.1142/S012918312050120X
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S012918312050120X
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S012918312050120X?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijmpcx:v:31:y:2020:i:09:n:s012918312050120x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpc/ijmpc.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.