IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v24y2025i06ns0219622025500208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PRASIAS: A New Preference Ranking Model for Comparing Organizational Performance Under Disruption

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjib Biswas

    (Amity University, Major Arterial Road, AA II, Newtown Kadampukur, West Bengal 700135, India)

  • Prasenjit Chatterjee

    (��Chief Research Fellow, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Sustainable Construction, Laboratory of Smart Building Systems, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania‡College of Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan§Department of Mechanical Engineering, MCKV Institute of Engineering, Howrah 711204, West Bengal, India)

  • Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

    (�Institute of Sustainable Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the organizational performance of automotive, fast-moving consumer goods, consumer durables, and healthcare during both pre-and post-pandemic periods, forming a dual objective. To achieve this, the paper uses a set of market price-based ratios including Price-to-Earnings (P/E), Price-to-Book value (P/B), Price-to-Sales (P/S), and Price-to-Cash Flow (P/CF), along with market risk, as indicators for performance comparison. The scope of the assessment is limited to the financial performance analysis. The paper also attempts to relate performance to long-term growth prospects measured by Tobin’s Q model. Second, the paper proposes a Multi-criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) model called Preference Ranking based on Similarity to Ideal Average Solutions (PRASIAS) to compare the organizations. PRASIAS is a novel extension of the recently introduced Preference Ranking on the Basis of Ideal-Average Distance (PROBID) method. PRASIAS uses similarity measures in terms of inclination angle and considers positive and negative ideal solutions, as well as the average solution, to provide a comprehensive decision-making framework. To determine criteria weights, the paper applies a recently developed model called Logarithmic Percentage Change-driven Objective Weighting (LOPCOW). The paper validates the results by comparing them with the outcomes of other MCDM methods, and it also performs sensitivity analysis to examine the stability of the ranking. From the results, it is evident that there are some variations in the comparative positions over the years. Cipla Ltd., Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd., Bajaj Auto Ltd., and Britannia Industries Ltd. secured the top positions. P/E ratio remains a dominant influencing factor, as indicated by the calculated weights. A positive association is observed between financial stability and the comparative ranking of the organizations, while Tobin’s Q has not proven to be a significant influencer. It is also noteworthy that COVID-19 has impacted the performance of these entities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjib Biswas & Prasenjit Chatterjee & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2025. "PRASIAS: A New Preference Ranking Model for Comparing Organizational Performance Under Disruption," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 24(06), pages 1771-1800, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:24:y:2025:i:06:n:s0219622025500208
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622025500208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622025500208
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622025500208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:24:y:2025:i:06:n:s0219622025500208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.