IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijitdm/v01y2002i04ns0219622002000427.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Process Analysis Of Computer-Generated Patient Reminders Delivered By Nursing Personnel

Author

Listed:
  • THOMAS G. TAPE

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983331 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3331, USA)

  • STEPHEN D. FLACH

    (Public Policy Center, University of Iowa, 217 South Quadrangle, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA)

  • JAMES R. CAMPBELL

    (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 983331 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-3331, USA)

Abstract

Purpose: To measure the extent to which health care reminders are offered by nursing personnel and accepted by patients, we performed a detailed process study of a computer-generated, patient-specific mammography reminder.Subjects: 25,971 consecutive visits by 2,814 women age 50 and older seen during an eight year period in an academic internal medicine practice.Methods: An implementation trial with historical controls was done in the Internal Medicine Clinic at the University of Nebraska Medical Center. We incorporated a computer reminder system into the nursing check-in process along with the standing orders for mammograms. The administration of the reminder, the patient response to the reminder, and subsequent follow-through with mammography were tracked during the intervention phase. Patients were considered "up-to-date" if a mammogram had been done within two years before the visit, or if one was obtained within 60 days after the visit.Results: The proportion of patients up-to-date increased from 48% during a four-year pre-intervention phase to 54% in the intervention phase. Process analysis showed that clinic personnel offered the reminder in 31% of eligible visits, 11% of reminded patients agreed, and 53% of patients who agreed had mammography done. One unsuspected carcinoma was diagnosed. Patient race, insurance coverage, and number of visits during the prior two years influenced whether patients agreed to mammography and whether they then had the test done.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas G. Tape & Stephen D. Flach & James R. Campbell, 2002. "A Process Analysis Of Computer-Generated Patient Reminders Delivered By Nursing Personnel," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(04), pages 693-705.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:01:y:2002:i:04:n:s0219622002000427
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219622002000427
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219622002000427
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219622002000427?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijitdm:v:01:y:2002:i:04:n:s0219622002000427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijitdm/ijitdm.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.