IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v26y2022i09ns1363919622400291.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-Lasting Appropriation Success Of An Innovation? A Comparative Case Study Of Bayer’S Aspirin And Roundup

Author

Listed:
  • PIA HURMELINNA-LAUKKANEN

    (Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland)

  • JIALEI YANG

    (Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 8000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland)

Abstract

Changes such as expiring patents and shifting environments challenge a firm trying to reach long-lasting appropriation success of an innovation. To understand how appropriation can be continued over time, this study investigates and compares Bayer’s two innovations, Aspirin medicine and Roundup herbicide. Whereas for the first, appropriation success has been continued through decades, for the latter, such a continuum has not realised. Our findings suggest that long-lasting appropriation success lies in adjusting the appropriation strategy by identifying the most substantial appropriability premises for innovation (appropriability mechanisms and complementary assets) and the ways to use them in different situations, paying specific attention to the shifting appropriability conditions. For long-term success, it is critical for firms to recognise that isolating appropriability mechanisms and complementary assets can have varied and distinctive implications depending on the pertinent contextual factors at innovation level and to strategise accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Pia Hurmelinna-Laukkanen & Jialei Yang, 2022. "Long-Lasting Appropriation Success Of An Innovation? A Comparative Case Study Of Bayer’S Aspirin And Roundup," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(09), pages 1-19, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:26:y:2022:i:09:n:s1363919622400291
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919622400291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919622400291
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919622400291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:26:y:2022:i:09:n:s1363919622400291. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.