IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/ijimxx/v01y1997i02ns1363919697000115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Management — Is There Still a Role for "Bootlegging"?

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Pearson

    (Manchester Business School, Booth Street West, Manchester, M15 6PB, United Kingdom)

Abstract

It has been suggested that "bootlegging" can lead to a special type of bottom-up innovation. Some recent research indicates that bootlegging is being carried out in over 75 per cent of laboratories in technology-based firms. It should therefore have a significant impact on innovation. However, it might be assumed that, by its very nature, it cannot be managed and hence the potential more effectively realised. By definition, it is an activity which does not fit within the normal programmed activity and, in some cases, is actually undertaken against the expressed wishes of the organisation. Using a simple framework which was developed to consider aspects of R&D project management and innovation strategy, it is argued that bootlegging can arise for many different reasons, such as "curiosity", to attack technical problems which have resulted in the disbandment of a project, or to assess markets which the organisation does not believe are viable or is not prepared to consider. If this is the case, one can conclude that the innovative performance of many organisations could be improved if more attention was paid to managing the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Pearson, 1997. "Innovation Management — Is There Still a Role for "Bootlegging"?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 1(02), pages 191-200.
    • Handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:01:y:1997:i:02:n:s1363919697000115
    DOI: 10.1142/S1363919697000115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S1363919697000115
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S1363919697000115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:ijimxx:v:01:y:1997:i:02:n:s1363919697000115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/ijim/ijim.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.