IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/igtrxx/v25y2023i02ns0219198923500032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faking Patience with Tacit Collusion

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Parilina

    (Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia)

  • Alessandro Tampieri

    (Department of Economics and Business, University of Florence and CREA, University of Luxembourg, Via delle Pandette 9, Florence 50127, Italy)

Abstract

This paper analyzes coordination in tacit collusion when firms’ discount factor is private information. We consider an infinitely repeated duopoly where two states of the world randomly occur, with different incentives for collusion. Depending on its own discount factor, a firm chooses cooperative behavior in both states (patient), in none of the states (impatient) or in one state (mildly patient). The presence of different states affects the strategic role of beliefs. A mildly patient firm has an incentive in “faking patience†to get the deviation profit. Interestingly, this effect prevents or delays collusion when the belief in patience is strong.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Parilina & Alessandro Tampieri, 2023. "Faking Patience with Tacit Collusion," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(02), pages 1-34, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:25:y:2023:i:02:n:s0219198923500032
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219198923500032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219198923500032
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219198923500032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Tacit collusion; duopoly games; unknown discount factor;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:igtrxx:v:25:y:2023:i:02:n:s0219198923500032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/igtr/igtr.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.