Author
Listed:
- Weifeng KONG
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China2College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 80, Zhongguancun Donglu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China)
- Hanchu LIU
(Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No.15 Zhongguancun Beiyitiao, Beijing 100190, China)
- Jie FAN
(Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 11A, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China2College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 80, Zhongguancun Donglu, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China)
Abstract
The conflicts in spatial planning are the main reason that restricts the sustainable development of land use in China, and it is also the main barrier to the building of “Territorial Spatial Planning System”. This study analyzes the conflicts between urban planning and land-use planning from the three dimensions of construction land, basic farmland and ecological land based on a land-use transition matrix with the central urban area of Liupanshui City, Guizhou Province as a case region, and analyzes the causes of spatial planning conflicts from the perspectives of the central and local governments in terms of their preferences and interactive relationships. The main conclusions of this paper are as follows. (1) Urban planning and land-use planning have comprehensive conflicts with each other in terms of the construction land, basic farmland and ecological land, i.e. the scale of construction land in urban planning is 154% of that in land-use planning, and the scale of basic farmland in urban planning is 88.56% of that in land-use planning. (2) Central and local governments are the two main stakeholders of spatial planning, and they have different preferences for the utilization of spatial resources at prefecture-level cities. The central government is concerned about food security, and therefore, pays more attention to the protection of cultivated land, while the local governments focus on economic benefits and the ecological environment, and therefore, pay more attention to construction and ecological lands. (3) The urban planning system is a bottom-up design system, which determines that urban planning mainly reflects the preferences of local governments, while the land-use planning system is a top-down design system, which determines that land-use planning mainly reflects the central government’s preferences. The policy implication of this study is that in order to manage spatial planning conflicts, it is necessary to manage the conflicts of interest among stakeholders.
Suggested Citation
Weifeng KONG & Hanchu LIU & Jie FAN, 2019.
"The Features and Causes of Spatial Planning Conflicts in China: Taking Urban Planning and Land-Use Planning as Examples,"
Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(02), pages 1-18, June.
Handle:
RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:07:y:2019:i:02:n:s2345748119500039
DOI: 10.1142/S2345748119500039
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Zhipeng Yang & Shijun Wang & Meng Guo & Junfeng Tian & Yingjie Zhang, 2021.
"Spatiotemporal Differentiation of Territorial Space Development Intensity and Its Habitat Quality Response in Northeast China,"
Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
- Liu, Yansui & Zhou, Yang, 2021.
"Territory spatial planning and national governance system in China,"
Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
- Yanru Zhao & Xiaomin Zhao & Xinyi Huang & Jiaxin Guo & Guohui Chen, 2022.
"Identifying a Period of Spatial Land Use Conflicts and Their Driving Forces in the Pearl River Delta,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:cjuesx:v:07:y:2019:i:02:n:s2345748119500039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/cjues/cjues.shtml .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.