Author
Listed:
- Yuxin Shu
(School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University Fujian, Fuzhou 350108, P. R. China)
- Han Song
(School of Management Chongqing, University of Technology Chongqing 400054, P. R. China3Green Supply Chain Innovation, Research Center of CQUT Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, P. R. China)
- Ying Dai
(School of Management Chongqing, University of Technology Chongqing 400054, P. R. China3Green Supply Chain Innovation, Research Center of CQUT Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, P. R. China)
- Jinchai Lin
(School of Management Chongqing, University of Technology Chongqing 400054, P. R. China3Green Supply Chain Innovation, Research Center of CQUT Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, P. R. China)
- Nali Shen
(Business School Southwest University of Political, Science & Law Chongqing 401120, P. R. China)
Abstract
The environmental deterioration caused by carbon emissions has enhanced people’s awareness of environmental protection. Governments, businesses and consumers are expected to reduce carbon emissions while ensuring their daily activities. Therefore, based on the background of carbon emission reduction, this paper explores the impact of different low-carbon subsidy methods of government on supply chain decision-making. Through analysis and solutions, the main research conclusions are as follows: the government’s subsidy model will not affect the retailer’s low-carbon publicity level and the manufacturer’s cost-sharing rate. However, the government subsidy coefficient will affect the carbon emission reduction level, carbon emission reduction yield, low-carbon goodwill, the manufacturer’s profit and the retailer’s profit. If the manufacturer and the retailer aim only to maximize profits, the government subsidies based on carbon emission reduction yield will not be the optimal choice, which is mainly because the government only considers carbon emission reduction yield and not carbon emission reduction cost. On the contrary, if both take into account carbon emission reduction, the government subsidy to consumers will not be the optimal choice. Finally, according to the analysis and discussion, we can get some management enlightenment and suggestions.
Suggested Citation
Yuxin Shu & Han Song & Ying Dai & Jinchai Lin & Nali Shen, 2025.
"Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions of Supply Chain Differential Game Under Different Government Intervention Models,"
Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 42(04), pages 1-49, August.
Handle:
RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:42:y:2025:i:04:n:s0217595924500246
DOI: 10.1142/S0217595924500246
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:apjorx:v:42:y:2025:i:04:n:s0217595924500246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/apjor/apjor.shtml .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.