IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/acsxxx/v25y2022i08ns0219525922500114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Intuition Fails: The Complex Effects Of Assimilative And Repulsive Influence On Opinion Polarization

Author

Listed:
  • SHUO LIU

    (School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, P. R. China)

  • MICHAEL MÄS

    (Institute of Technology Futures, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Douglasstraße 24, Karlsruhe 76133, Germany)

  • HAOXIANG XIA

    (School of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, No. 2 Linggong Road, Dalian 116024, P. R. China)

  • ANDREAS FLACHE

    (Department of Sociology, University of Groningen, Grote Rozenstraat 31, Groningen 9712 TG, The Netherlands)

Abstract

There is a public and scholarly debate about whether personalized services of social-media platforms contribute to the rise of bipolarization of political opinions. On the one hand, it is argued that personalized services of online social networks generate filter bubbles limiting contact between users who disagree. This reduces opportunities for assimilative social influence between users from different camps and prevents opinion convergence. On the other hand, empirical research also indicated that exposing users to content from the opposite political spectrum can activate the counter-part of assimilative influence, repulsive influence. Fostering contact that leads to opinion assimilation and limiting contacts likely to induce repulsive interactions, it has been concluded, may therefore prevent bipolarization. With an agent-based model, we demonstrate here that these conclusions fail to capture the complexity that assimilative and repulsive influence generate in social networks. Sometimes, more assimilative influence can actually lead to more and not less opinion bipolarization. Likewise, increasing the exposure of users to like-minded individuals sometimes intensifies opinion polarization. While emerging only in specific parts of the parameter space, these counter-intuitive dynamics are robust, as our simulation experiments demonstrate. We discuss implications for the debate about filter bubbles and approaches to improve the design of online social networks. While we applaud the growing empirical research on the micro-processes of assimilative and repulsive influence in online settings, we warn that drawing conclusions about resulting macro-outcomes like opinion bipolarization requires a rigorous analysis capturing the complexity of online communication systems. Intuition alone is error-prone in this context. Accordingly, models capturing the complexity of social influence in networks should play a more important role in the design of communication systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuo Liu & Michael Mã„S & Haoxiang Xia & Andreas Flache, 2022. "When Intuition Fails: The Complex Effects Of Assimilative And Repulsive Influence On Opinion Polarization," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 25(08), pages 1-30, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:25:y:2022:i:08:n:s0219525922500114
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219525922500114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525922500114
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219525922500114?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:25:y:2022:i:08:n:s0219525922500114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/acs/acs.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.