IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wsi/acsxxx/v14y2011i03ns0219525911003104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distributed On-Line Multi-Agent Optimization Under Uncertainty: Balancing Exploration And Exploitation

Author

Listed:
  • MATTHEW E. TAYLOR

    (Computer Science Department, Lafayette College, Easton, PA 1804, USA)

  • MANISH JAIN

    (Computer Science Department, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

  • PRATEEK TANDON

    (Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

  • MAKOTO YOKOO

    (Department of Informatics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 819-0395, Japan)

  • MILIND TAMBE

    (Computer Science Department, The University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA)

Abstract

A significant body of work exists on effectively allowing multiple agents to coordinate to achieve a shared goal. In particular, a growing body of work in the Distributed Constraint Optimization (DCOP) framework enables such coordination with different amounts of teamwork. Such algorithms can implicitly or explicitly trade-off improved solution quality with increased communication and computation requirements. However, the DCOP framework is limited to planning problems; DCOP agents must have complete and accurate knowledge about the reward function at plan time.We extend the DCOP framework, defining theDistributed Coordination of Exploration and Exploitation(DCEE) problem class to address real-world problems, such as ad-hoc wireless network optimization, via multiple novel algorithms. DCEE algorithms differ from DCOP algorithms in that they (1) are limited to a finite number of actions in a single trial, (2) attempt to maximize the on-line, rather than final, reward, (3) are unable to exhaustively explore all possible actions, and (4) may have knowledge about the distribution of rewards in the environment, but not the rewards themselves. Thus, a DCEE problem is not a type of planning problem, as DCEE algorithms must carefully balance and coordinate multiple agents' exploration and exploitation.Two classes of algorithms are introduced:static estimationalgorithms perform simple calculations that allow agents to either stay or explore, andbalanced explorationalgorithms use knowledge about the distribution of the rewards and the time remaining in an experiment to decide whether to stay, explore, or (in some algorithms) backtrack to a previous location. These two classes of DCEE algorithms are compared in simulation and on physical robots in a complex mobile ad-hoc wireless network setting. Contrary to our expectations, we found that increasing teamwork in DCEE algorithms maylowerteam performance. In contrast, agents running DCOP algorithms improve their reward as teamwork increases. We term this previously unknown phenomenon theteam uncertainty penalty, analyze it in both simulation and on robots, and present techniques to ameliorate the penalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew E. Taylor & Manish Jain & Prateek Tandon & Makoto Yokoo & Milind Tambe, 2011. "Distributed On-Line Multi-Agent Optimization Under Uncertainty: Balancing Exploration And Exploitation," Advances in Complex Systems (ACS), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(03), pages 471-528.
  • Handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:14:y:2011:i:03:n:s0219525911003104
    DOI: 10.1142/S0219525911003104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219525911003104
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1142/S0219525911003104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wsi:acsxxx:v:14:y:2011:i:03:n:s0219525911003104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tai Tone Lim (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.worldscinet.com/acs/acs.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.