IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v44y2020i1p1-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A.M. Best Ratings Outlooks and Financial Strength Ratings Changes

Author

Listed:
  • Jill M. Bisco
  • Stephen G. Fier
  • Ashley Holder

Abstract

The assessment of an insurer’s ability to pay future claims often relies in part on the use of financial strength ratings (FSRs), which offer insight into the risk of insurer insolvency. In order to communicate the potential for future changes to FSRs, ratings organizations often supplement these ratings with outlooks. While these outlooks should be of great interest to various stakeholders, very limited research exists examining whether outlooks actually predict future changes in ratings and thus serve as additional sources of information that could be used when assessing insurers. In this study we examine the predictive power of A.M. Best ratings outlooks on future changes to FSRs. Our results suggest that ratings outlooks do provide valuable information and that both prior years’ outlooks and changes in prior years’ outlooks are useful in predicting future ratings changes. Our results also indicate that following an outlook change, the probability of an FSR change diminishes over time. Finally, we show that while outlooks do provide valuable information, investors do not appear to respond to changes in outlooks. Our findings imply that ratings outlooks should be given greater consideration by consumers, investors, insurance intermediaries, and regulators when evaluating insurers as they do provide valuable insight into the future direction of the firm’s financial strength rating.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill M. Bisco & Stephen G. Fier & Ashley Holder, 2020. "A.M. Best Ratings Outlooks and Financial Strength Ratings Changes," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 44(1), pages 1-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:44:y:2020:i:1:p:1-37
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.insuranceissues.org/PDFs/441BFH.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:44:y:2020:i:1:p:1-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.