IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wri/journl/v39y2016i2p113-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Preferences for Structured Settlements Consistent with the Loss†Minimization Objective of Tort Law?

Author

Listed:
  • Patricia Born
  • Robert Puelz

Abstract

In this paper, we test several hypotheses developed from a theory of structured settlements under the loss†minimization objective of tort law with a large sample of liability insured, closed claim data from the state of Texas. Our findings indicate support for the hypothesis that structured settlements are more likely utilized when longevity risk is higher and the predictability of future needs is more uncertain. We find that higher damages are associated with a higher likelihood of structured settlement payouts, which is supportive of a wealth effect concern. Further, we find that a larger share of economic damages, relative to total damages, are associated with a higher likelihood of a lump†sum settlement, consistent with the prediction of matching risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Patricia Born & Robert Puelz, 2016. "Are Preferences for Structured Settlements Consistent with the Loss†Minimization Objective of Tort Law?," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 39(2), pages 113-136.
  • Handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:39:y:2016:i:2:p:113-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://search.proquest.com
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wri:journl:v:39:y:2016:i:2:p:113-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: James Barrese (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.